Skip to main content

Elaine..Costa Rica..sounds great (bring me back coffee). The idea of a tax or tithe on SEAMO income is reasonable and I agree is the rule (we are the exception). However, the issue of outside income is a separate issue. If faculty member A makes $0 outside of her practice while faculty member B generates $50K of outside income, I expect the former would feel a "flat tax" on internal income was inequitable. The proposed tax on outside income is not an attempt to harvest money..it is meant to change behaviour and have faculty focus on the broader academic mission and limit outside work to a reaosnable amount (ie <$20K). This is conceptually different than your proposal, which is intended to raise operating dollars (and is not designed to change behaviour). It may be that both interventions are necessary. A modest flat tax to generate operating funds for the Divisions and Dept is worth considering.

Name
Stephen Archer
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.